tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19791491.post1543977859099170802..comments2023-09-28T15:43:24.855+02:00Comments on Vilhelm Konnander's weblog: Putin World's Richest ManVilhelm Konnanderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09167606906861836286noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19791491.post-1423876575357554652008-09-04T20:42:00.000+02:002008-09-04T20:42:00.000+02:00He is a very powerful man not only in Europe but t...He is a very powerful man not only in Europe but the whole world. If only you knew...<BR/><BR/>www.EuropeWord.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19791491.post-59068003234392118662008-04-30T02:33:00.000+02:002008-04-30T02:33:00.000+02:00Dear Stalker,I am really ironising over the whole ...Dear Stalker,<BR/><BR/>I am really ironising over the whole affair. In any normal country, it would be likewise normal for a president to earn quite a lot of money before, during or after his tenure. Not so in Russia though. <BR/><BR/>So, what if Putin owns 40 billion USD? Would it be all that wrong - at least if he had made them honestly? <BR/><BR/>Oh, yeah - right. I almost forgot. As there were no functioning laws in Russia during the 1990s, everyone who made some money broke the law. So, if Putin really had been stinking rich, he would have been a criminal - just like Khodorkovsky or any wealthy person disapproved by power.<BR/><BR/>Then, corruption would be the only alternative to explain Putin's alleged wealth. The logic would be: Corruption by next to any public office is presupposed, why Putin must be corrupt if he actually was so rich, because he has been a public servant all his life and has not had any other known source of income. Because Putin cannot possibly be a speculator, who has earned a fortune during privatization or on the stock-exchange. It is not even thinkable that Putin might have exploited the masses in such a way.<BR/><BR/>Such reasoning and discussion could go on and on forever. My point is that it is impossible to deal with such a question in current Russian society, because the system works as it does - regardless of whether Putin is the richest man in the world or not (Who cares?). Nobody really wants to rock the boat by publicly discussing the merger of political and economic power in Russia. As long as that is not the case, there is no way to avoid speculations like that about Putin, and such a discussion is legitimate as long as transparency in these matters does not prevail. <BR/><BR/>The whole affair - both allegations and denials - implicitly smells of a greater moral collapse and double standards, because nothing in such a discussion can ever logically add up, why the conclusion must be that all the gaps in the logic is due to corruption or criminality, etc. In the end it becomes wholly absurd. <BR/><BR/>Yours,<BR/><BR/>VilhelmVilhelm Konnanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04506899921990227704noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19791491.post-1539006053774208922008-03-14T00:13:00.000+01:002008-03-14T00:13:00.000+01:00Alternatively, he could be thinking that these cha...Alternatively, he could be thinking that these charges are so ridiculous that there is absolutely no need to deny them. <BR/><BR/>Indeed, given that there is only one source of these rumors (Stanislav Belkovsky) with no supporting evidence that I'm aware of, the reaction is quite logical.akarlinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08322298490656235467noreply@blogger.com